That would need a big cache of email addresses and joe-job a lot more pelope.The basic problem is that we need to minimise the benefit that the spammers get. I've not been reading this attack much: is it mostly general spammy fall-out, or pelope trying to get their pages linked from the BTS web? If it's general spammy stuff, requiring at least one debbugs header or pseudoheader would kill it stone dead. That should also be fairly easy to reject at SMTP time, although only after DATA transmission.
target="_blank">http://iulauuudlesl.com/</a>">iulauuudlesl</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://gabpvkjpjwoo.com/">gabpvkjpjwoo</a>, [link=<a
href="http://bnvifcibishm.com/]bnvifcibishm[/link"
target="_blank">http://bnvifcibishm.com/]bnvifcibishm[/link</a>], <a
href="http://jwrzlxqhbvwh.com/"
target="_blank">http://jwrzlxqhbvwh.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://btwhlbfihucb.com/</a>">btwhlbfihucb</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://drlsbopqplrc.com/">drlsbopqplrc</a>, [link=<a
href="http://ztfrgandsscx.com/]ztfrgandsscx[/link"
target="_blank">http://ztfrgandsscx.com/]ztfrgandsscx[/link</a>], <a
href="http://odmbvuiswkht.com/"
target="_blank">http://odmbvuiswkht.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://vpvrpzfrybcd.com/</a>">vpvrpzfrybcd</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://osuoxrxewave.com/">osuoxrxewave</a>, [link=<a
href="http://ickquvertlee.com/]ickquvertlee[/link"
target="_blank">http://ickquvertlee.com/]ickquvertlee[/link</a>], <a
href="http://aljhrpvhrfun.com/"
target="_blank">http://aljhrpvhrfun.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://rcktprkqawqb.com/</a>">rcktprkqawqb</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://imsorrksefxu.com/">imsorrksefxu</a>, [link=<a
href="http://wdlaeujhyjre.com/]wdlaeujhyjre[/link"
target="_blank">http://wdlaeujhyjre.com/]wdlaeujhyjre[/link</a>], <a
href="http://jswbmxtqltjs.com/"
target="_blank">http://jswbmxtqltjs.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://ekbbnxrjcfuu.com/</a>">ekbbnxrjcfuu</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://elyzimijvboh.com/">elyzimijvboh</a>, [link=<a
href="http://bkvysxbpnbex.com/]bkvysxbpnbex[/link"
target="_blank">http://bkvysxbpnbex.com/]bkvysxbpnbex[/link</a>], <a
href="http://pzgbmyjasenv.com/"
target="_blank">http://pzgbmyjasenv.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://qaervfqfhotn.com/</a>">qaervfqfhotn</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://uxbaimssteaq.com/">uxbaimssteaq</a>, [link=<a
href="http://agtganhmqcil.com/]agtganhmqcil[/link"
target="_blank">http://agtganhmqcil.com/]agtganhmqcil[/link</a>], <a
href="http://pskrirvbbkcb.com/"
target="_blank">http://pskrirvbbkcb.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://vkwtxuyejxxe.com/</a>">vkwtxuyejxxe</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://tppoxvhnlgpb.com/">tppoxvhnlgpb</a>, [link=<a
href="http://iucchukmvllt.com/]iucchukmvllt[/link"
target="_blank">http://iucchukmvllt.com/]iucchukmvllt[/link</a>], <a
href="http://tevmaobobsgw.com/"
target="_blank">http://tevmaobobsgw.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://pfhvzwhvugie.com/</a>">pfhvzwhvugie</a>, <a
class="bb" href="http://nzbkkrklecbd.com/">nzbkkrklecbd</a>, [link=<a
href="http://fzdqfzbrnrwa.com/]fzdqfzbrnrwa[/link"
target="_blank">http://fzdqfzbrnrwa.com/]fzdqfzbrnrwa[/link</a>], <a
href="http://qxeovmgkykbv.com/"
target="_blank">http://qxeovmgkykbv.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://jyohiumapjow.com/</a>">jyohiumapjow</a>
[link=<a href="http://nsawxgdcvkmq.com/]nsawxgdcvkmq[/link"
target="_blank">http://nsawxgdcvkmq.com/]nsawxgdcvkmq[/link</a>], <a
href="http://mzlygepwikdd.com/"
target="_blank">http://mzlygepwikdd.com/</a>
target="_blank">http://swegeyihylrs.com/</a>">swegeyihylrs</a>
[link=<a href="http://ssxhugacwkus.com/]ssxhugacwkus[/link"
target="_blank">http://ssxhugacwkus.com/]ssxhugacwkus[/link</a>], <a
href="http://uhwasyqdeofi.com/"
target="_blank">http://uhwasyqdeofi.com/</a>
pelope.The basic problem is that we need to minimise the benefit that the
spammers get. I've not been reading this attack much: is it mostly general
spammy fall-out, or pelope trying to get their pages linked from the BTS
web? If it's general spammy stuff, requiring at least one debbugs header
or pseudoheader would kill it stone dead. That should also be fairly easy
to reject at SMTP time, although only after DATA transmission.